Decreased Clinical Toxicity and Two-Phase Elimination Kinetics Observed After Intravenous Iron Sucrose Overdose.

BACKGROUND: Management of oral iron overdoses is well-established, but there is limited literature regarding intravenous iron sucrose overdoses. Indications for administering deferoxamine after oral iron overdoses include clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity, along with a serum iron concentration ≥ 500 µg/dL. Reported signs and symptoms of iron sucrose overdose do not appear to correlate with those of oral iron overdoses. CASE REPORT: We present a case of intravenous iron sucrose overdose in a clinically well-appearing patient with a presenting serum iron concentration that was several times higher than the usual threshold concentration for initiating deferoxamine treatment. A 21-year-old woman presented to the emergency department after an accidental intravenous iron sucrose overdose. The patient received a home infusion of 1000 mg iron sucrose, which was five times the prescribed dose. Her presenting serum iron concentration was 1799 µg/dL, with bicarbonate and anion gap both within normal limits and an unremarkable physical examination. Because she did not have evidence of severe iron toxicity, she was treated supportively and deferoxamine was not administered. Her serum iron concentration decreased below the toxic range over the next 14 h, and she was discharged home the next day. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This patient was managed successfully with expectant care alone, suggesting that iron sucrose overdose has much lower toxicity than oral iron salt overdose. This discrepancy between measured iron concentrations and clinical presentation may be explained by the elimination kinetics of iron sucrose having separate redistribution and elimination phases.

Rates and types of urine drug screen false negative results compared with confirmatory toxicology testing in major trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers are required to screen patients for alcohol use, and if necessary, intervene and refer to treatment (SBIRT). Similar screening for illicit drug use is recommended but not required. Urine drug screening (UDS) underestimates problematic substance use. This study aimed to estimate the types and rates of UDS false negatives (FN) compared to comprehensive testing by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of deidentified urine samples from adult trauma and burn activation patients. Both UDS and LC-MS comprehensive testing of >200 analytes were performed by a reference laboratory on all samples. Iatrogenic medications were excluded from the FN count. Crosstab analyses were conducted for UDS versus LC-MS outcomes to establish FN types and rates. We dichotomized the results by creating an "intentionality" variable (intentional injuries by self/others versus accidental injuries). A series of crosstabs with odds ratios considered intentionality by substance class and demographics. Statistically significant variables by Chi-Square were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Psychoactive FN were detected in 56/100 urine samples analyzed; the most frequent included anticonvulsants (primarily gabapentin, N = 13), opioid agonists (N = 12), antihistamines (primarily diphenhydramine, N = 10), and phenethylamines (primarily bupropion, N = 5). Nonpsychoactive FN were detected in 70/100 samples; the most common were nicotine (N = 33), caffeine (N = 23), acetaminophen (N = 22), and antidepressants (N = 12). Of substance classes included in the UDS and also tested by LC-MS, FN occurred for opiates (3%), amphetamines (5%) and opioids (25%). Polypharmacy was associated with fall injuries in elderly patients. Cocaine (p = 0.015) and cannabinoids (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with intentionality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that FN for potentially important psychoactive and nonpsychoactive substances are common when toxicologic testing is limited to routine UDS in trauma patients. We recommend expanding SBIRT in this patient population to include misuse of tobacco products, prescription analgesics, and over-the-counter antihistamines.

A Case Report of a Severe, Unusually Delayed Anaphylactoid Reaction to Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine During Treatment of Acute Acetaminophen Toxicity in an Adolescent.

INTRODUCTION: Anaphylactoid reactions are well-documented adverse events associated with the intravenous administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with acetaminophen overdose. Most reactions are mild, occurring within the first 1-5 hours of initiation. This report presents the case of an adolescent with a delayed, life-threatening anaphylactoid reaction 24.5 hours after starting NAC, where discontinuing NAC could have resulted in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) and death. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old previously healthy female presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain 10 hours after an acute acetaminophen ingestion. Her 11-hour serum acetaminophen concentration was above the treatment line (149 µg/mL), and she had elevated transaminases (AST = 202 U/L, ALT = 284 U/L). She was treated with intravenous NAC, which was suspended for 3 hours after she developed an apparent life-threatening anaphylactoid reaction with angioedema and respiratory distress 24.5 hours after treatment initiation. Given her high risk of progression to FHF, NAC was resumed at double the previous rate along with scheduled corticosteroids and antihistamines after resolution of her symptoms. Her AST increased to 10,927 U/L, and INR peaked at 3.6, but she had no further anaphylactoid symptoms. She was discharged in her normal state of health after 6 days. DISCUSSION: Discontinuing NAC in this case of severe, delayed anaphylactoid reaction could have resulted in FHF requiring liver transplant. The reason for her reaction is unclear but could be related to patient risk factors or medication error. Guidelines for reinitiation of NAC after development of delayed anaphylactoid reactions are not well-established.  Close observation beyond the first 1-5 hours of NAC administration is warranted.